The Exaltation of Jesus, Part 1

I tend to think the American Christian church, and even the Reformed church neglects the doctrine of Jesus' Ascension, or Current Exaltation. Where is Jesus right now? What is he doing? Why does your knowledge of it matter to your walk with Christ?

Listen to Acts 1:9. This is the moment of his ascension, "And when he had said these things, as they were looking on, he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight." That's it. It's subtle. They were watching and listening to him. He starts levitating. And a small cloud takes him up through the clouds. But then angels appear and interpret his leaving this way in v. 11, "This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven…” So we have two word groups describing the ascension. We have "lifted up," and "taken up into heaven." But notice how Peter describes it to Luke in the next chapter, in Acts 2:32-33, "This Jesus God raised up [that's his resurrection], and of that we all are witnesses.  (33)  Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, …" [But that's an elaboration on his ascension. He didn't just leave us to go into the clouds. He didn't just go to heaven the way we leave Florida or Mississippi to come home to Mobile. Peter explains by the Holy Spirit that God the Father exalted Jesus the Messiah who died and rose again by seating him on the throne of exalted glory - the throne of the Messiah, the true throne of David: ruling from the position of the right hand of the Father. THAT's what happened in Acts 1:9. That is what Christ has been doing for the last two thousand years: ruling and reigning as the Messiah over all. The one who descended in the incarnation is also ascended to the right hand of the Father. (Ephesians 4). AND THIS HAS INNUMERABLE IMPLICATIONS FOR YOU AS A CHRISTIAN.]

  1. it means your Messiah, who has brought you into union with him, he is now untouchable, seated on David's Throne.

Psa 2:1-7  Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain?  (2)  The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD and against his Anointed, saying,  (3)  “Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.”  (4)  He who sits in the heavens laughs; [he mocks unbelievers!] the Lord holds them in derision.  (5)  Then he will speak to them in his wrath, and terrify them in his fury, saying,  (6)  “As for me, I have set my King on Zion, my holy hill.”  (7)  I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, “You are my Son; today I have begotten you. [an action of God’s wrath to this world of unbelief and unbelievers is the coronation of his Son, the Anointed One, the Messiah to his right hand. And David and Peter together are saying, he cannot be pulled off the throne.]

He cannot be ripped down. The greatest atheists and scientist have tried. He cannot be thwarted. Satan, the world, and the flesh, have yet to succeed in two thousand you. He cannot be assailed. Where are all the arrogant throughout time who made claims against Christ? Dead. But he is now. He is resurrected. And seated permanently on the throne of glory. He cannot be mutinied. He cannot lose. All flesh will rally against him and crash likes waves at the feet of his throne; destroying themselves; destroyed by the Messiah of God. Beloved, this is King Jesus. This is your Husband. He is victorious. And since He has won, and you are his wife by faith, you too shall overcome your sin and flesh and this world. Listen to how our brother Martin Luther puts it in his memorable hymn:

1 A mighty fortress is our God,
a bulwark never failing;
our helper he, amid the flood
of mortal ills prevailing.
For still our ancient foe
does seek to work us woe;
his craft and power are great,
and armed with cruel hate,
on earth is not his equal.

2 Did we in our own strength confide,
our striving would be losing,
were not the right Man on our side,
the Man of God's own choosing.
You ask who that may be?
Christ Jesus, it is he;
Lord Sabaoth his name,
from age to age the same;
and he must win the battle.

3 And though this world, with devils filled,
should threaten to undo us,
we will not fear, for God has willed
his truth to triumph through us.
The prince of darkness grim,
we tremble not for him;
his rage we can endure,
for lo! his doom is sure;
one little word shall fell him.

4 That Word above all earthly powers
no thanks to them abideth;
the Spirit and the gifts are ours
through him who with us sideth.
Let goods and kindred go,
this mortal life also;
the body they may kill:
God's truth abideth still;
his kingdom is forever!

In Christ, and with you all, (Mobile, AL)

Pastor Josh

5 Points of Calvinism (ish?)

The Four (or Four-and-a-half) Pointers:

 After the Reformed Church in the Netherlands answered the Arminians, a man name Moses Amyraut entered the debate. Amyraut was a French Reformed Theologian and Pastor from the very late 1500's to the mid 1660's.

Moses Amyraut

Amyraut was not arguing for Arminianism. In fact, it appears Amyraut in general agreed with the Five Points of Calvinism. Where Amyraut parted ways with the Five Points was in how best to articulate the crossroads between unconditional election and the atonement of Jesus. This view is called Amyraldianism, after - you guessed it - Amyraut. In the past in the United States, you could find this position in colonial Congregationalist and Presbyterian pockets, due to the influence of Pastor Richard Baxter, who was somewhat Amyraldian on this topic.

Richard Baxter (Boy, all these old pastors look the same)

Today you can find this view amongst Brethren churches, some Southern and Reformed Baptists, and Bible churches.

Amyraut taught that Jesus hypothetically died for all mankind (contrary to limited atonement) but, that God elected only some to salvation, not all. According to Amyraut, God did this by decreeing Christ's atonement before he decreed who was elect. This means the Father ordained Jesus to die for an amorphous mass, a hypothetical "all," as part of a new covenantal order.

Now, it is true that Jesus' death inaugurated a new covenantal order: the new covenant (Jeremiah 31, Ezekiel 36, Hebrews 9 & 10). But what Amyraut meant by this is not what Reformed Theologians meant. Reformed theologians in general have believed, that, since the breaking of the covenant of works by Adam (Genesis 3), the only door into covenantal relationship with God is "by faith;" more specifically by faith in the coming Messiah (from the OT perspective) and by faith in the already-come Messiah (from the NT perspective). Not just that Jesus exists; but faith in his life for our righteousness, his death for our sins, and in his resurrection for our regeneration.

In contrast, Amyraut taught that Jesus died, not just to establish a new covenant, but a new way to interact with the covenant: by faith. That’s all. He didn’t elect people. He elected faith to be the means of conversion. Covenant theologians argued, "but that's not new!" To Amyraut it was. So all men (all people, not just the church) are under the new covenantal order (an idea Reformed Theologians would deny). But only those elected by the Father would respond with regenerate faith. This regenerate faith manifests itself by obedience. So then to Amyraut what's the difference between believers and unbelievers? Your faithfulness; not Christ's work. Many have called this position "hypothetical universalism." (You’re welcome for the big theological phrase.) But, as you can tell Amyraut's view starts getting into philosophical understandings of the decree of God, a form of universal atonement, and a denial of Christ's penal, substitutionary atonement, and therefore a confusion of faith with faithfulness as the cause for interacting with God's promises, which is legalism. For this reason the Westminster Confession of Faith intentionally denies Amyraldianism as an accurate depiction of the Bible and the Reformed Faith, saying:

WCF 3:6. As God has appointed the elect unto glory, so hath he, by the eternal and most free purpose of his will, foreordained all the means thereunto. Wherefore, they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by Christ, are effectually called unto faith in Christ by his Spirit working in due season, are justified, adopted, sanctified, and kept by his power, through faith, unto salvation. Neither are any other redeemed by Christ, effectually called, justified, adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect only.

So, no. I’m sorry. We’re not trying to just be a bunch of meany heads. While many who call themselves Calvinists, don’t agree with all the Five Points, yet denying any one of the Five Points, including this one, certainly does not make you Reformed. The Five Points will stand and fall together, as we will begin to see in later posts.

In Christ, and with you all,

Pastor Joshua Sparkman

Current Sermon Series: Acts 1:6-8

In the first book, O Theophilus, I have dealt with all that Jesus began to do and teach,  2  until the day when he was taken up, after he had given commands through the Holy Spirit to the apostles whom he had chosen.  3  He presented himself alive to them after his suffering by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about the kingdom of God.  4  And while staying with them he ordered them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which, he said, "you heard from me; 5  for John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now." 6  So when they had come together, they asked him, "Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?"  7  He said to them, "It is not for you to know times or seasons that the Father has fixed by his own authority. 8  But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth."  

The Work of Christ at Pentecost (vv.6-8)

The disciples appear to meet together in Jerusalem. 

6  So when they had come together, they asked him, "Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?" [Wait, what!? They are still unclear about the relationship of the church to the nation of Israel. It is true that the flourishing of God's people is central to the kingdom. But it is not true that that people exist in the mode of the nation of Israel. They are still thinking in terms of Old Covenant realities. And honestly, it's hard not to blame them. The Old Covenant is all they've ever known.

You and I do the same thing. We slip back into old ways of thinking. Or we presume worldly ways of thinking now in Christ. How often do you do that? How often to you import old values, old desires, into your walk with Christ?

But, the apostles certainly missed all Jesus' points in Matthew 21-25 about the nation of Israel. The nation of Israel is gone as God's people. Sure, the nation as a state still existed, but soon it wouldn’t. By A.D. 70 it would be crushed by the Romans, which Jesus prophesied in Matthew 25. But the church has emanated out from National Israel. It was always there, and now has been brought out. And the church - not the nation - is the fullest expression of Jesus' Bride. We are not waiting for God to fulfill specific promises to modern day Jerusalem. There are not promises just to ethnic or national Israel. The nation that was created in 1948, and who is in the middle of a war right now, is not the object of Yahweh's love. You (the church; the bride of Christ) are. And therefore, any church prayer or message that still treats modern Israel as the special people of God is wrong. Any churches that wave the Israelite flag, any Christian movements that prioritize Israel for theological reasons, are twisting Scripture. It's one thing to be pro-self defense for any nation. It's one thing to be pro-democracy in a nation. It's one thing to support a national ally. Those are all issues for people in all societies to have differences of opinion on. But it's another thing entirely for the church of the Lord Jesus Christ to declare the nation of Israel is still the Beloved of God. That theology within Christianity is called Dispensationalism. Within Judaism its called … Zionism. And Dispensationalism has only been around for about 140 years old. It's a belief, that though Jesus has already come to fulfill the Old Testament, that ultimately God wants to create a greater temple in Jerusalem and go back to the Old Testament ceremonial system. But that would be a denial of Jesus' fulfilling them. It's concluding the same wrong assumption that the apostles have here. And Jesus rebukes them.]  7  He said to them, "It is not for you to know times or seasons [First, their assumption is wrong. Second, there will be a restoration of Israel, but as the prophet Joel showed us in prior sermons it will include the ingathering of the Gentiles. But, what God will do when he sees fit is not for them to know. And it's not for us to know. The secret things belong to the Lord. Only that which has been revealed to us in Scripture is ours (Deuteronomy 29:29). None of us know, when the total restoration of the God's people will occur. And that's why it's silly and sinful for these false teachers to arise every once in a while to declare the timing of Jesus' return. Jesus is applying Deuteronomy 29:29, “The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law."

We don't live by God's secret will. That's why it's silly to presume to know, or live by, whether or not you're living in "the will of God." If by that you mean, "am I doing what he has commanded"? That's an excellent question! And it may be answered by a basic exposition of God's Word according to the agenda of the gospel. But, if by that you mean, "am I walking with secret knowledge about the providence of God for my life?" The answer to that will always be, “that's not for you know." Stop prying.

We live by the commanded Word alone. The restoration is] that [which] the Father has fixed by his own authority. [So, that's not to be our focus as the church. What then is?] 8  But [instead of living by secret knowledge, or by Old Covenant ideas …] you [the church] will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, [He's talking about the outpouring of the Holy Spirit; the third person of the Trinity. This occurs in the very next chapter. THAT’s what the apostles and the 120 are to be occupied by. They are to be focused on the right power wielded in their hearts and souls by the Spirit. They are to be focused on another wonderful work of Christ: the Spirit’s abiding, tabernacling, and empowering the church to die to its sin, to create a redeemed community, and to share and spread the gospel. It is the Holy Spirit who empowers us to do the Great Commission.

This is why before every worship service, every sermon, every Bible study, every family devotion, we ask God, and ask the Holy Spirit, for equipping to understand the Word, and for power to share the good news with others.

If you're focused on the secret knowledge of God - you're in the wrong. If you're focused on worldly, carnal delight - you're in the wrong. If you're focused on Old Testament ideals - you're missing it. If you're mis-identifying your desires for kingdom desires - there's no power or grace from God for that. If you're focused on building your own little kingdom - that's not why you're indwelt by the Spirit. The outpouring of the Spirit is not for the individuals of the church to become the best version of themselves that they can be. No.

The out-pouring of the Spirit is so that … ] you will be my witnesses [The church now will be the arms and feet of Jesus' kingdom.

I have a question. When was the last time you were a witness for Christ? When was the last time you talked about the theology, ethics, or text of Scripture with someone else? Have you ever discipled anyone? That's not just my job. It's all our jobs. When was the last time you talked about Jesus with an unbeliever? Do you even know people outside the faith? Or are you confusing your self-righteous life with being a witness? Or, how many of you by your clear sin, are compromising your witness? How many of you, if your co-workers were to be asked, if you're a Christian, they'd be shocked that the answer is yes? You are not here for you. You are not here even for your family. You are here, and your family is here, to serve the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords. He lived for your righteousness, died for your sin, resurrected to give you new life, sent his Spirit to indwell you and empower you. Why? To live a West Mobile suburban life; to live comfortably? No. To be his witnesses! Not sharing your testimony, per se, though you may. But sharing Jesus' testimony.

Where?] in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth." [Now in some sense v.8 actually give us the outline of the book of Acts. Chapters 1- 8 are focused solely in Jerusalem. Chapters 8-10 focus on the gospel going to Judea and Samaria. And Chapters 11-28 showcase the gospel going to "the ends of the earth," even before the mighty Caesar. But more than that, this text is oftentimes improperly used today.

Many churches will count themselves metaphorically as "Jerusalem," and their missions will be to Judea, Samaria, and the uttermost parts. And that is how they will minister. Except, it misunderstands one central reality. Our churches are not Jerusalem. We are "the uttermost parts of the world." We are the Gentiles, even though now we are the Israel of God (Galatians 6:16).

But still the basic point is to go: go to your families, your friends, your co-workers, to the park, to your neighbors, share the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Jesus’ great work at Pentecost is to send his Holy Spirit to make you part of the church, equip for ministry, and to make you function as salt and light. But I wonder how many of us are functionally hyper-Calvinists. We don't share the good news because "that's not our personality," "that's not my gifting," "I don't have opportunity." You're sinning against Christ and the Holy Spirit; you're rejecting the purpose of the outpouring of the Spirit; if you're living for yourself, and you're unwilling to pour into others, or talk about the gospel with others. Instead, Christ frees you from such things. He will forgive you, and empower you by his Holy Spirit to live for his Kingdom glory. Hallelujah!]

Introducing: Current Sermon Series: Acts 1:1-5

Acts 1:1-5: In the first book, O Theophilus, I have dealt with all that Jesus began to do and teach,  2  until the day when he was taken up, after he had given commands through the Holy Spirit to the apostles whom he had chosen.  3  He presented himself alive to them after his suffering by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about the kingdom of God.  4  And while staying with them he ordered them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which, he said, "you heard from me; 5  for John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now."

The Works of Christ from the first until Pentecost (vv.1-5)

Now, as soon as we jump into this text, we realize we are in a different genre of biblical book. Acts is New Testament history.

In the first book, O Theophilus, [So, recognize then there is a prequal to the book of Acts. And if we scan through the New Testament, we find in chapter one of the Gospel of Luke, the same reference to “Theophilus.” So then, it's proper to conclude that the book of Acts is a continuation of the story started in the book of Luke. In fact, we could easily call the book of Acts, "Second Luke." However, we don't know exactly who Theophilus is. It could be that he is a Christian Roman official who wants, or needs, to hear the official story of this new religious sect that has come out of Judaism. The reason I think he may be a Christian is because both Luke and Acts seem to have Luke referencing him with some kind of Christian affection.

But then we have to ask the question who is the "I" who is talking? And the answer is "Luke." Luke is a physician. He appears to be a Jewish convert to Christianity living in the Roman city of Troas. In fact, the first sixteen chapters of the book of Acts speak in term of the historical "they." But finally in Acts 16 when Paul stops in Troas (v.8), he receives revelation from the Spirit not to go into Asia. Instead, he received a dream to go to Macedonia. And suddenly, the narrative switches from "they" to "we," in Acts 16:1, "So, setting sail from Troas, we made a direct voyage to Samothrace…" What just happened!? Well … Luke was converted. And he joins Paul's entourage. And eventually he has the function within Paul's group of writing this history, the Gospel of Luke and the book of Acts.

So, the author himself joins your spiritual family. How awesome is it Beloved, that you see the moment when a Bible writer converts to Christ!? Have you?

And he is commissioned by God under the apostles to write a history of the church from Jesus' first works all the way up to Paul's testimony to Caesar."

So, in the gospel of Luke Luke primarily focused on the mighty works of Christ … ] I have dealt with all that Jesus began to do and teach, [and the reason why he says "began to do and to teach" is because while Jesus did many wonderful redemptive events (in fact, the greatest of them all: his righteous life, his atoning death, his marvelous resurrection), including teach on the essentials of his kingdom ethic, there was much more to do, and much more to teach. And Jesus told his disciples this would be the case. Regarding the continuation of Jesus' works, Jesus said in John 14:12  “Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I am going to the Father." [First, note Jesus is preparing his disciples for the time after he ascends on high to the right hand of God, which will happen in our next section. But, second, Jesus isn't saying that the acts of his people would be greater than his own. That's literally not possible. But he is saying that his redemptive works would be spread through the church to a greater scope, that is, beyond Israel, to the Gentiles.

And Christian, did you realize you are part of this agenda? You’re only saved because the gospel of Jesus Christ came to you because John 14:12 is true. Will you not also take it others?

But, he made the same point about his teachings in John 16:12-13  “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now.  (13)  When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth …" [And that is what the rest of the New Testament is. Christ, through the Holy Spirit, teaches us the rest of what he began to teach the disciples.

Have you ever looked at the New Testament this way? It is the completion of everything Jesus began to teach in the gospels. You lack nothing he gave to the church.

So then there is no division between Jesus' words in the gospel and Jesus' words in the rest of the New Testament. The same way, there is no division between the words of the Old Testament and the words of the New.

And now, here comes more revelation through the work of Luke. So, the gospel of Luke tracks Jesus' words and works from the beginning …] 2  until the day when he was taken up, [now, that sounds like past tense. And when he wrote that sentence it was past tense. But, it is literally the next event we will look at. So, "taken up" is not a reference to his resurrection from the dead, but to Jesus' ascension on high to the right hand of God. And there is a bit of time in between those events. But, he was taken up …] after he had given commands through the Holy Spirit to the apostles whom he had chosen. [That appears to be a time-reference to Jesus’ giving of the Great Commission. So these first two verses are all introduction to the book.

But, Luke goes on to talk about the works and teachings Jesus laid down in between his resurrection and his ascension. Did you know Jesus even did that? And its honestly quite remarkable.]  3  He [that is, Jesus] presented himself alive to them [that is, the apostles] after his suffering [that is, after the torture of the cross, after his death, after his burial, and after his resurrection] by many proofs, [Remember, Mary grabbed his feet; he appeared to the disciples in the closed room; Thomas stuck his hands into his torn side; they saw his nail-pierced hands; he appeared to the two on the road to Emmaus. All of this happening in his resurrected body; not as a phantasm, not as a ghost. But in the same body he had prior, just now transformed into a resurrected body. But he didn't just do this once, but …] appearing to them during forty days [So, he was regularly with them throughout this time between Passover and Pentecost. Clearly, he wasn't with them the entire fifty days. But, he continued to present himself over and over again. Why?] and speaking about the kingdom of God. [So they are still learning from him! He's giving them additional revelation! And there's no reason to think we don't have this revelation in the rest of New Testament books. But its more than that …] 4  And while staying with them [He's not just popping up here and there. King Jesus is abiding with his apostles in his resurrected state for at least forty days. That by itself is an amazing work. He's there when they wake up, there when they go to bed, eating, going about their day. No wonder the apostles change from being a bunch of cowards at the end of the gospel of Matthew to bold in Christ by Pentecost.

Today, Jesus is not physically present with his church. But, he sent the Holy Spirit, the Third Person of the Trinity, to no less abide with us, than he did with the apostles. But are we more or less courageous to share, teach, and disciple with the gospel? You don't need him to manifest himself to you. It's enough that that he was abiding with them. But, does this embolden your witness for Christ? He died. They thought they lost. But, he was resurrected. And talking to them, discipling them, giving them more revelation. Your Christ, your Husband, has conquered the grave, for himself, and for you. Does that change AT ALL the confidence you ought to have in his kingdom and work?

The resurrected Jesus is abiding with them, talking with them, shepherding them, teaching them. Now, originally, he told the apostles to meet him in Galilee. But now they are back in Jerusalem. And …] he ordered them not to depart from Jerusalem, [Now, this would be dangerous. The Jewish leadership just killed their master, their king, their Messiah. They will be gunning for the apostles too. Doesn’t matter!

And this is true for you too. There will be times when people will hate the idea of you following Christ. But, will you obey in humility and thankfulness regardless? The call is to thankfully obey his commands motivated and empowered by that FACT of his redeeming you. It is not to be scared of those around you. Will you continue to be scared? You may have to sacrifice career, comforts, influence, success, to obey the good kingdom commands of Christ. Is he worth it to you? Not to gain him, or to gain more of him, or even to gain salvation. But, because all of Christ and his salvation has been given to you, and the temptation to fear, and disobey, muddies and soils the salvation he’s already given to you. Will you allow your comforts, the world, the schemes of the devil to muddy the gem of your salvation in Christ? Or, Beloved, will you pray even now that in that day, maybe even today, you will have the courage to live for Christ with boldness?

But, the apostles are to wait for something particular.] but to wait for the promise of the Father, which, he said, "you heard from me; 5  for John [the Baptist] baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now."

[Jesus is applying to the apostles and the 120 something John the Baptist said about the difference between John and Jesus. And you can find this in Matt 3:11-12  “I [John] baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. [he's talking about Jesus] He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.  (12)  His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.”

These texts should end any idea that John's baptism and Christian baptism are the exact same thing. They are not. And to further end all doubt, read Acts 19 where converts from following John are baptized into Christ. The Christian church must stop insisting that the mode and theology of John's baptism is the same as Christian baptism. It isn’t. (SHOCKER! I KNOW!) John was the greatest Old Testament prophet. He was the fore-runner of the Lord. His baptism was with water, as an Old Testament rite. Christian baptism is not that.

Jesus is the Great Prophet. He establishes the New Covenant by his death and resurrection. His baptism is a sign and seal of the covenant of grace. And his baptism comes with the indwelling Holy Spirit who, grants life to some, and judges the rest. THAT Holy Spirit, THAT corporate baptism - the outpouring of the Holy Spirit - the apostles now must remain in Jerusalem to wait for.

But for how long? At this moment … they do not know.

Find out more in our next post, from our current sermons series through Acts.

Introducing: the Doctrines of Grace (or, the Five Points of Calvinism)

The Five Points of Calvinism in History and Personally:

The Five Points of Calvinism are historically and personally controversial. Historically, they are a response to the Five Points of Arminianism. The Five Points of Arminianism are named after Jacob Arminius, a Dutch Pastor and Theologian in the mid-1500's to the early 1600's. Some people have accused me of being a direct descendant of good ole Arminius (pictured below). But I promise, though we look alike, I am not.

Jacob Arminius

Those who identified with his system of theology are called "Arminians." (No, this is not the same label as the people from the country Armenia.) This is quite important today. While American evangelicalism was originally Calvinistic, today it is not, but Arminian. In fact, most American evangelical churches today teach the Arminian system of doctrine. For instance, if you believe the natural person, though a sinner, can still reach out to God in faith, unassisted by God, then, whether you knew it or not, you are Arminian in your thinking.

The Arminians and the Reformed were both Dutch. In fact, at the time, they were both apart of the Dutch Reformed Church. The Arminians were publicly antagonistic to the Reformed Theology being taught in Geneva and in the Netherlands. So they published the Five Points of Remonstrance, or "ardent protest". The Reformed Church responded publicly. They held a gathering of their church court at Dordrecht to answer these five doctrines point for point. And [drum roll please] the Five Points of Calvinism were born. The name of that Synod was the Synod of Dort. So, the Five Points of Calvinism, or the Doctrines of Grace, were a reaction to false teaching.

However, some have objected to the name "Calvinism." And I don’t mind the objection. It's not unlike the difference between "Calvinism" and "Reformed Theology." When your average Southerner hears the category "Calvinism" many respond as though you just said a cuss word. But, when you say "Reformed Theology" they are shockingly open. Maybe because "Reformed" and even "the Protestant Reformation" hasn't been taught in our churches in a long time. Maybe because the "Calvinism" well has been poisoned by opposing pastors for a long time. Or maybe, it is genuinely the name. And, the name does matter. It's unfortunate that the Five Points were named after John Calvin, a French pastor and theologian in the early to mid-1500's.

John Calvin

I highly doubt Calvin would have appreciated the name. But, it isn't named after him per se, but the system of theological thought attributed to him. If anything, Calvinism strives, using the doctrine of Sola Scriptura and the method of expository teaching, to be clearly biblical. Sola Scriptura is a mantra of the Reformation calling for the church to find its ultimate authority for any doctrine or practice in "The Scriptures Alone," hence Sola (Alone) Scriptura (the Bible). Further, expository teaching naturally flowed out of Sola Scriptura. If the Bible is our ultimate authority for any doctrine or practice, then the church should stick close to the text going verse by verse, chapter by chapter, through the Bible. This doctrine Calvin unapologetically taught. And this method of teaching is throughout his commentaries and his books. However, Jacob Arminius was three years old when Calvin died. So, Calvin wasn't even alive for the controversy, let alone the pithy response of the Five Points. The Synod of Dort was held from 1618-1619. But Calvin died in 1564, more than fifty years before. But still, he wouldn't have liked the Five Points named after him. And I personally don't mind the Reformed Church apologizing for the reference. We should not be naming movements or doctrines after sinful men. Yet, these five points of biblical doctrine are and will still be referenced as "the Five Point of Calvinism," or "the Doctrines of Grace."

Personally, these doctrines are both so biblical and so contrary to our flesh that many Christians reject the headings and the content. In fact, some just irrationally respond with vitriol to the headings. You’ll see more all the heading in future blogposts. Oddly enough when presented with the content from the Bible, but without the headings, many Christians will see just how eminently biblical the Five Points of Calvinism are. But, when you reinsert the headings … the fangs come out. However, I'm confident that the Holy Spirit working through the plain teaching of his Word, will actually show you the vast storehouses of comfort that come, not just by the doctrine, but when we see the connections of these doctrines to our living and reigning Savior, His Father in Heaven, and the Spirit who abides in us. In following posts, I will personally strive to show how each doctrine relates to your relationship with each person of the Trinity and the gospel.

In Christ, and with you all,

Rev. Joshua Sparkman

Christ Presbyterian Church (2131 Cody Road S.)

cpcmobile.com

Introducing the Reformation Mobile Blog

Welcome to Reformation Mobile, the blog. This blog is a public ministry of Christ Presbyterian Church to Mobile, Alabama. The address of Christ Presbyterian Church is 2131 Cody Road S Mobile, AL 36695.

We are a PCA church. PCA stands for "Presbyterian Church in America." The PCA is the largest and most theologically conservative Reformed and Presbyterian denomination in the U.S. today. You may recognize names like Kevin DeYoung, R.C. Sproul, D. James Kennedy, James Montgomery Boice, Francis Shaeffer, Ligon Duncan, and Tim Keller. All those men have all been, or are, prominent voices of our denomination.

R.C. Sproul

Christ Presbyterian and the PCA hold to the Westminster Confession of Faith and its Catechisms. The confession does not sit over Scripture, but guards the church like a guard rail on the road from the many false teachings we see today.

We are therefore a self-consciously Reformed and Presbyterian ministry. What does that mean? It means we will be characterized by particular biblical categories. First, we are committed to Expository Teaching and Preaching (2 Timothy 4:2 ). That means we will open up God's holy (Psalm 19:7-9), inerrant (John 17:17) Word, and make sure the lessons and sermons we present are indeed the main point of the text (Psalm 119:105).

"Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path."

Second, in our teaching and preaching, as we go through the text of Scripture, we are also dedicated to presenting Christ's life, death, and resurrection as the fulfillment of any text (Luke 24:27),

"And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself."

and how its applicable to you (2 Tim. 3:16-17).

"All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,  (17)  that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work."

This is an aspect of teaching and preaching many ministries entirely skip. And it oftentimes ends up in a legalistic message. Legalism is either that the message is basically works righteousness ("try harder", "do better"), or where the grace is so removed from God's command that it appears to teaching salvation, or the Christian life, is based on our works. Jesus warns repeatedly about legalism. The gospel of Jesus Christ is not about your works for him, but about the good news of Jesus' works of righteousness for you before God. Third, we believe in what is called the Regulative Principle of Worship. That means we may worship the Triune God only in the ways he has determined for gathered worship, in his Word (1 Chronicles 13:5-15 & Numbers 3:1-4). Our Triune God has not left us to our sinful imaginations as to how to worship him. That means you will not find smoke machines, nor obstacle courses, nor Santa, in worship here. But you will find a call to worship (Psalm 149:1-2), confession of sin (Leviticus 5:5 and Romans 10:10), singing of tradition and new hymns and biblical songs (Colossians 3:16), sound preaching and instruction in the gospel, theology, and life, and the sacraments of baptism (Matthew 28:18-20) and the Lord's Supper (Acts 2:42). It should be unmistakably clear that we worship King Jesus, not a political party, a football team, or aspects of our culture. Fourth, we are elder-led. The pastor does not run "the show." In fact, there is no show. No gimmicks. The pastor and elders work together, submitting to God's Word and the agenda of Christ laid down in the Scriptures (as seen in Acts 15). We believe elders may be only biblically qualified, and grace-qualified, men. We will therefore not have tons and tons of staff and pastors. But regular, local men, who have been set part by God with graces and gifts, and trained, to disciple the Lord's sheep. This means we hold to the Doctrines of Grace. We believe that in and of ourselves (without God) we are sinners, deserving of his wrath, and thoroughly rebellious (Genesis 6:5), dead in our trespasses and sins, and cannot save ourselves by any works, let alone by our good works (Philippians 3:1-14). We believe Christ's redemptive work of living for our righteousness and dying for our sins is the alone grounds of our salvation (2 Corinthians 5:20-21). He also died only for his own people (John 10:27-28). We believe God's choosing of the sinner is what led the sinner to choosing God (Ephesians 1:4 & 1 John 4:19). And we believe that all those whom the Lord has saved will indeed be those saved when He returns in glory (Philippians 1:6). Lastly, you will be taught historic Protestant and Reformed doctrine clearly from the Word. We will not appeal to gurus, and popes. But we will strive to bring forth the clear teaching of the text of Scripture as we think it necessarily leads to Protestant and Reformation theology.

We are starting this blog so that we can make available good content for Mobile, Alabama. We want to help anyone navigate the intersection of the faith in the Bible, Theology, Culture, and Life in Mobile, Alabama. We will address things singles, parents, and grandparents need to hear. And we will strive to do it from a gracious, biblical worldview, that honors God in his holiness and in his mercy. We hope you are edified by this content. Come join us in worship every Sunday @ 10:15 (2131 Cody Road S. Mobile, AL 36695).

 

 

In Christ, and with you all,

to the Glory of God alone!

Pastor Josh Sparkman